| Given the type of lattice, the lattice constants of Fe, Ni, Co (look it up!), and the magnetization curves in chapter 4.3-2: How large are the magnetic moments of these atoms in terms of a Bohr magneton? |
| |
| Simple - but still a bit tricky. |
| | First we get the basic data:
- Lattice Fe: bcc; lattice constant a = 2.86 Å; atomic density ρA(Fe) = 2/0.2863 atoms/nm3 = 85.5 atoms/nm3
- Lattice Nifcc; lattice constant a = 3.52 Å; atomic density ρA(Ni) = 4/0.3523 atoms/nm3 = 91.7 atoms/nm3
- Lattice Co: bcc; lattice constant a = 2.51 Å, c = 4.0 7Å; atomic density ρA(Co) = 2/[½ · c · a2 · 3½ atoms/nm3 = 90.1 atoms/nm3
|
| | Then we realize that the curves in chapter 4.3-2 give the maximum magnetization, i.e. the magnetization state for all magnetic moments perfectly aligned. From the figure we can deduce the following numerical values for the saturation magnetization mSat:
- mSat(Fe) = 17 · 105 A/m
- mSat(Fe) = 5 · 105 A/m
- mSat(Fe) = 14 · 105 A/m
|
| | However, the units shown are A/m, which are not what we would expect. Obviously we must convert this to - well, what exactly? |
| If we look at a Bohr magneton, mBohr, we have |
| |
|
| | Obviously, the unit we need is Am2. We obtain that by multiplying the A/m by m3, which makes clear that the mSat numbers given are per m3 - as they should be! |
| The magnetic moments mA per atom are thus |
| |
|
| What we obtain is |
| |
mA(Fe) = | 17 · 105 A/m
85.5 atoms/nm3 | = | 17 · 105
85.5 | A · 10–27 m3
m | = | 1.98 · 10–23 A/m2 | = 2.14 mB |
| | | | | | | |
mA(Ni) = | | | | | | 5.45 · 10–24 A/m2 | = 0.588 mB |
| | | | | | | |
mA(Co) = | | | | | | 1.55 · 10–23 A/m2 | = 1.67 mB |
|
|
| Now that is an interesting result! It's satisfying because we actually get sensible numbers close to a Bohr magneton, and it's challenging because those numbers are not very close to 1, 2, or possibly 3. |
| | For example, how can a Ni atom have a magnetic moment of 0.588 mB, and a Fe atom one of 2.14 mB, considering that the spins of the electrons carry exactly 1 mB? |
| There are two possibilities for this apparent discrepancy:
- Our calculation is somehow a bit wrong
- There are some effects not yet discussed that change the magnetic moment an atom in a crystal lattice carries around with itself somewhat.
|
| | The first possibility can be ruled out, because in standard textbooks, e.g. in the "Kittel" we find the following values for mA
- mA(Fe) = 2.22 mB
- mA(Ni) = 0.606 mB
- mA(Co) = 1.72 mB
Not identical, but close enough. In fact, looking more closely, the Kittel values are for T = 0 K, whereas our values are for room temperature T = 300 K and thus should be a bit smaller. |
| | Obviously, this leaves us with some effects not yet discussed. What these effects could be, we can only guess at. Here is a short list:
- There might be some interaction between the spins of the electrons and the "orbits" of the electrons that modifies the magnetic moment
- The free electrons of the electron gas in our metal also "feel" the ordered spins of the atoms and react to some extent by adjusting their spins.
|
| | This can lead to quite sizable effects. Dysprosium (Dy), for example, a rare earth metal, is a ferromagnet below its Curie temperature of 88 K and its atoms than carry an mA(Dy) = 10.2mB. |
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire