mercredi 1 janvier 2020

Magnetic Moments of Fe, Ni, Co (Exercise and Solution)


Given the type of the lattice, the lattice constants of FeNiCo (look it up!), and the magnetization curves in chapter 4.3-2, the question is:
How large are the magnetic moments of these atoms in terms of a Bohr magneton?


Solution to Exercise  

Given the type of lattice, the lattice constants of FeNiCo (look it up!), and the magnetization curves in chapter 4.3-2: How large are the magnetic moments of these atoms in terms of a Bohr magneton?
Simple - but still a bit tricky.
First we get the basic data:
  • Lattice Febcc; lattice constant a = 2.86 Å; atomic density ρA(Fe) = 2/0.2863 atoms/nm3 = 85.5 atoms/nm3
  • Lattice Nifcc; lattice constant a = 3.52 Å; atomic density ρA(Ni) = 4/0.3523 atoms/nm3 = 91.7 atoms/nm3
  • Lattice Cobcc; lattice constant a = 2.51 Å, c = 4.0 7Å; atomic density ρA(Co) = 2/[½ · c · a2 · 3½ atoms/nm3 = 90.1 atoms/nm3
Then we realize that the curves in chapter 4.3-2 give the maximum magnetization, i.e. the magnetization state for all magnetic moments perfectly aligned. From the figure we can deduce the following numerical values for the saturation magnetization mSat:
  • mSat(Fe) = 17 · 105 A/m
  • mSat(Fe) = 5 · 105 A/m
  • mSat(Fe) = 14 · 105 A/m
However, the units shown are A/m, which are not what we would expect. Obviously we must convert this to - well, what exactly?
If we look at a Bohr magneton, mBohr, we have
mBohr  =  9.27 · 10–24 Am2
Obviously, the unit we need is Am2. We obtain that by multiplying the A/m by m3, which makes clear that the mSat numbers given are per m3 - as they should be!
The magnetic moments mA per atom are thus
mA  =  mSat
ρA
What we obtain is
 
mA(Fe)  =  17 · 105 A/m
85.5 atoms/nm3
  =  17 · 105
85.5  
A · 10–27 m3
m 
  =  1.98 · 10–23 A/m2 =  2.14 mB
        
mA(Ni)  =      5.45 · 10–24 A/m2 =  0.588 mB
        
mA(Co)  =       1.55 · 10–23 A/m2 =  1.67 mB
Now that is an interesting result! It's satisfying because we actually get sensible numbers close to a Bohr magneton, and it's challenging because those numbers are not very close to 12, or possibly 3.
For example, how can a Ni atom have a magnetic moment of 0.588 mB, and a Fe atom one of 2.14 mB, considering that the spins of the electrons carry exactly 1 mB?
There are two possibilities for this apparent discrepancy:
  1. Our calculation is somehow a bit wrong
  2. There are some effects not yet discussed that change the magnetic moment an atom in a crystal lattice carries around with itself somewhat.
The first possibility can be ruled out, because in standard textbooks, e.g. in the "Kittel" we find the following values for mA
  • mA(Fe) = 2.22 mB
  • mA(Ni) = 0.606 mB
  • mA(Co) = 1.72 mB
Not identical, but close enough. In fact, looking more closely, the Kittel values are for T = 0 K, whereas our values are for room temperature T = 300 K and thus should be a bit smaller.
Obviously, this leaves us with some effects not yet discussed. What these effects could be, we can only guess at. Here is a short list:
  • There might be some interaction between the spins of the electrons and the "orbits" of the electrons that modifies the magnetic moment
  • The free electrons of the electron gas in our metal also "feel" the ordered spins of the atoms and react to some extent by adjusting their spins.
This can lead to quite sizable effects. Dysprosium (Dy), for example, a rare earth metal, is a ferromagnet below its Curie temperature of 88 K and its atoms than carry an mA(Dy) = 10.2mB.

Reference: https://www.tf.uni-kiel.de/matwis/amat/elmat_en/kap_4/exercise/e4_3_2.html

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire

PHYS5660 Semiconductor Physics and Devices (Download Area)

  Front Matter Assessment Modes - Contacts - Academic Honesty Announcement Class Notes Ch I - The Basics and What we are Intereste...